Home About Us the Rabbis Contact Us

what's new on Revach
Parshas Tzav: Rabbeinu Bachaye - Covering the Shame of Sinners

Parshas Pinchas: Rav Yehonoson Eibshitz - Where did Zimri the Great Tzaddik go Wrong?

Showering the Night Before a Taanis

Ha Lachma Anya: Rav Eliyahu Dessler - Celebrating Freedom With Poor Bread

Rav Yaakov Edelstein - The Two Words He Wanted to Be Able to Speak
Section: Questions   Category: Money Matters
  A r c h i v e s
Money Matters - Dropped Sandwich
Submitted by anonymous  Answered by Rav Yehonoson Hool
Answer: It would seem from the story that the sandwich was dropped accidentally, though not in a way that could be described as unpreventable. As such, this would come under the category of "p'shi'ah" - recklessness. Had you taken due care, presumably it would not have fallen. Although you received no remuneration for doing the favour, you nonetheless are financially responsible in such a situation. (Shomer chinam chayav bepeshi'ah.)

Although Reuvain left a message allowing you to eat the sandwich, if he left the message after you had already dropped it, he didn't know at that moment that it was already ruined and that you owed him the value of it instead. Reuvain was not giving a gift, but rather he thought that since he would have no need for it, not being available to eat it , the sandwich would go to waste anyway so he might as well let you eat it. Had he known that there was no sandwich, there is no reason to assume that he wanted to gift you the value.

Thus it seems to me that you would have to pay - or at any rate, to inform Reuvain what happened and leave it up to him.

posted:2013-10-21 17:11:42  (0) comments   email to a friend

Money Matters - Exorbitant Misquoted Charge
Submitted by Devorah  Answered by Rav Yehonoson Hool
Answer: If you were aware of the charges at the time that you rented and used the camera, you must pay at the rate agreed. If you were not aware when you used it and only heard afterwards about the exorbitant charge, you need not pay more than the going rate in this case.

If you were the one ordering and paying, and your daughter was picking it up on your behalf, with you being the one who ordered it and is paying for it, then even if your daughter knew about the charge, if she didn't tell you until after you had used it you would not need to pay the full charge.

However if you were aware of the price at the time that you used it, your use of it implies agreement to the terms- if you don't agree then don't use it - and thus you would need to pay the full amount.

posted:2012-11-21 07:49:08  (0) comments   email to a friend

Money Matters - contractor over budget
Submitted by anonymous  Answered by Rav Yehonoson Hool
Answer: Without hearing the worker's side of the story it is impossible to say for sure. In general though, if the price was agreed for a specific work itinerary, and nothing extra was added after the price was fixed, the worker is not entitled to ask for more at the end.

There may be circumstances in which he can ask for more, such as if the price changes and he cannot complete the work without taking a financial
loss. However, this and other such possibilities can only be ascertained by hearing the full story from both parties.

posted:2012-07-17 05:28:34  (0) comments   email to a friend

Money Matters - Employee Waiver
Submitted by anonymous  Answered by Rav Yehonoson Hool

1.  Yes, you must return the extra money that you were mistakenly not charged.

2.  The decisive factor in these type of questions is whether the employee of the company has the authority to give a reduction of this nature.
A supermarket cashier, for example, is probably authorized to allow you to pay 10 agorot less than the price. But to give a significant reduction would
require the permission of the manager.

The question here then is whether the bus driver is authorized to waive the extra money. I suspect that in this case he is not, and thus you would need to pay the company.

To be certain, contact the company and ask them if the driver has such authorization.

posted:2012-07-17 05:15:26  (0) comments   email to a friend

Money Matters - Tsadaka Lottery Winnings
Submitted by anonymous  Answered by Rav Yehonoson Hool
Answer: An almost identical question was asked some time ago.(http://revach.net/ask/archives.php?cid=10&subcat=Tzedaka)

Here's what I wrote then (with a significant additional sentence after the first paragraph):


Answer: With regard to the free gift from a charity organization, it seems to me that one should estimate how much one would have paid for the gift by itself, which one then pays out of one's own pocket, and then the rest can come from ma'aser money. For example if the organization gives a silver cup to anyone who donates $200, and one would pay for such a cup $20, one should give $20 from one's own money, and then one may give the other $180 from ma'aser money.

However, there is room for not making such a deduction, and accepting the gift for free, whilst giving all of the money from ma'aser. This is especially true if the gift is relatively cheap.

One may purchase a lottery ticket from a tzedakkah organisation with ma'aser money. But one should make the following calculation. How much would I have been willing to pay for the ticket had the proceeds not gone to tzedakkah? That amount should come from his own pocket and the remainder may be paid from ma'aser money. For example, if the ticket cost $10, and had the proceeds not gone to tzedakkah he would have been willing to pay $6 for the ticket, he should pay $6 from his own pocket, and may pay the remaining $4 from ma'aser money.

If one wins a prize, one should preferably return to tzedakkah the value of the ticket purchased. As for the rest of the value of the prize, don't forget to take ma'aser from that and give it to tzedakkah!

(R' Moshe Feinstein rules as follows: If there are a fixed number of tickets in the lottery, then there must be a value for each ticket based on the probability of winning, and if the asking price is not much greater than the actual value, such that even one who has no interest in supporting the charity would buy a ticket for that price, one may not purchase the ticket with ma'aser money. If, however, there is no fixed limit to how many tickets will be sold, one cannot fix any value to any single ticket, and thus one may purchase the ticket with ma'aser money.)

If one paid the whole value of the ticket with ma'aser money, and one wins a prize, R' Chaim Kanievsky (Derech Emunah, Matnas Aniyim 7 paragraph "ve'echad me'asarah...") is of the opinion that the entire prize belongs to tzedakkah, as is R' Yisroel Yaakov Fisher (Even Yisrael II 64). However, R' Yaakov Blau (Tzedakkah Umishpot 1:(84)) permits one to pay for the ticket with ma'aser money if one cannot make the above calculation - if one wins a prize, though, one should return the cost of the ticket to tzedakkah as explained above, and tithe the rest of the prize too.

posted:2012-01-29 23:40:25  (0) comments   email to a friend

Money Matters - Maaser for Megilla
Submitted by anonymous  Answered by Rav Peretz Moncharsh
Answer: No. Maaser must be used to benefit others, not to purchase objects for yourself, even if they are used for a mitzva.
posted:2011-02-14 09:03:26  (0) comments   email to a friend

Money Matters - Tallis with no unique simmon
Submitted by Pinchas  Answered by Rav Yehonoson Hool

It is possible that this particular Tallis belongs to someone else, and it is also possible that it belongs to the tzibbur.

As such, you would not be permitted to take it unless you were absolutely certain that this Tallis belongs to you.

posted:2009-12-16 02:51:39  (0) comments   email to a friend

Money Matters - Exchanged Talis
Submitted by anonymous  Answered by Rav Yehonoson Hool
Answer: When someone performs a service for someone else, even if unsolicited, the recipient must pay for any benefit derived from this.
There are, however, several qualifications to this, and a comprehensive discussion of this issue is beyond the scope of this forum.
However, in this case the ruling would appear to be as follows:
Since the cleaning is irreversible, if the Tallis needed cleaning the owner would need to reimburse you the cost of the cleaning. If it needed no cleaning whatsoever (for example it had just been cleaned by the owner) he need not pay you anything. If it was somewhere in between, he should pay you the amount one who had a Tallis in such a condition would be willing to pay to get it cleaned.
posted:2009-11-11 18:08:26  (0) comments   email to a friend

Displaying 1-8 of 8 (Page 1 / 1) 


    Most Viewed Lists
  1. "Zissen" Pesach
  2. Toivel Hot water Urn
  3. Bracha for bANANAS
  4. sprinkler on Shabbos clock
  5. shaving body
    Last Viewed
  1. Hilchos Shabbos
  2. kettle used on shabbat by goy
  3. Do I have to return the money..
  5. Flour Grinded after Pesach